Effect of Chemical Fertilization on Yield and Natural Pigments of Cactus Pears Fruits

 

Fatma A. Ahmed1,4*, Fahmy Ibrahim Fahmy2, Mohamed Ahmed Abd El-Wahab3 and Waleed Mohamed Abd El-Azim3

1Phytochemistry Unit, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo 11753, Egypt

2Plant Production Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo 11753, Egypt

3Cultivation of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Unit, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo 11753, Egypt

4Regional Development Centers (RDC), Academy of Scientific Resaerch and Technology (ASRT), Cairo 11694, Egypt

*For correspondence: dr.fatmaahmed2022@yahoo.com

Received 23 February 2022; Accepted 26 November 2022; Published 27 February 2023

 

Abstract

 

This study was carried out on a cactus pear orchard grown in calcareous soil at El-Hammam region, Matrouh Governorate, over two consecutive seasons in 2020 and 2021. This work aimed to find the best mineral fertilization treatment for increasing the yield of plants, as it has yet to be studied under the conditions of this region. The study was a randomized complete block experiment. The fertilization treatments were as the following: - (control, 100 g N + 40 g P + 70 g K/plant, 100 g N + 40 g P + 90 g K/plant, 100 g N + 60 g P + 70 g K/plant, 100 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K/plant, 120 g N + 40 g P + 70 g K/plant, 120 g N + 40 g P + 90 g K/plant, 120 g N + 60 g P + 70 g K/plant and 120 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K/plant). Increasing nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization rates improved vegetative growth, fruit quantity, and quality traits over control. The highest fertilization rate (120 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K/plant) significantly recorded the best physical characteristics (fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, fruit volume, juice weight, peel weight, peel thickness, pulp weight/fruit, number of seeds/fruit, and seeds weight/fruit). Furthermore, fruits had suitable chemical parameters (total soluble solids, total acidity content, total soluble solids/acid ratio, and ascorbic acid content). The most useful chemical fertilization amount was the basal dressing of 120 g N, 60 g P, and 90 g K/plant in this area. © 2023 Friends Science Publishers

 

Keywords: Cactus pear; NPK fertilization; Fruit; Quantity; Quality; Pigments

 


Introduction

 

Cactus pear or Indian fig opuntia (Opuntia ficus-indica L., Family: Cactaceae) is a cactus species that is a domestic crop produced throughout arid and semiarid regions of the globe. The cactus pear is the most commercially important cactus. It is grown chiefly as a fruit crop and for other purposes, including food and medicinal industries, cosmetics, fodder, and soil erosion prevention. Cacti are suitable crops for dry zones because they convert water into biomass efficiently. The fruits are commercialized in many parts of the world and consumed raw. They have one of the highest concentrations of vitamin C. As fruits have vitamin C, they were once utilized to mitigate scurvy. Jams are made from fruits. The red color of the fruits and juice is owed to betalains; the fruits also contain flavonoids and are very nutritious. They have 14% fructose, 1% protein, 20% solids, glucose, ascorbic acid, fatty oil, and a resinous substance. The fruits are used to treat diarrhea (Kuti 2004; Neffar et al. 2013; Zimmer 2013; Miller 2015; Badr et al. 2019; Fattah et al. 2020; Ueckert 2020).

Until now, the cactus pear farms did not receive enough attention in the fertilization programs, like other fruit plants in desert areas. The shortage in mineral nutrients influences cactus pear plant metabolism, negatively impacting fruit yield and quality. Cactus pear plants differ physiologically and morphologically from most other crop plants. For this reason, fertilizer recommendations applied to other crops are unsuitable. The mineral nutrition studies on cactus pears show that chemical fertilizer application is generally valuable for fruit production. Nutrient elements influence the cactus pear's fruit yield and quality. Macroelements have the most significant impact on fruit production. N, P, and K are the most limiting nutrients in cacti and affect their yield (Claassens and Wessels 1997; Dubeux et al. 2006; Zegbe et al. 2014, 2015; Silva et al. 2016; Souza et al. 2017; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2018; Neto et al. 2020).

Cultivating the cactus pear crop is profitable for local farms in the desert due to its low production costs, high-added value crop, and tolerance to environmental conditions such as high temperatures, drought, and poor soils (Mason 2015). Concerning the agriculture processes, many farmers still depend on organic fertilizers only in production without chemical fertilizers, which leads to a decrease in the yield and quality attributes. Other farmers add very high nitrogen fertilizers, resulting in excessive vegetative growth and reduced fruit yield.

Calcareous soils possess high levels of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) that affect soil properties related to plant development. Cultivating calcareous soils presents numerous difficulties, such as low water holding capacity, high infiltration levels, shoddy construction, low organic matter, and clay content. Moreover, low cation exchange capacity (CEC), loss of fertilizers via leaching, texture crusting and cracking, increased pH, losing nitrogen fertilizers, and low availability of nutrients (Elgabaly 1973; El-Hady and Abo-Sedera 2006; FAO 2016; Aboukila et al. 2018). Therefore, the crops that can resist such poor soil conditions are like the cactus pear. So, calcareous soils are suitable for the cultivation of this plant.

Farmers overlook the importance of chemical fertilization for cactus pear farms, despite its importance in improving fruit crop characteristics such as quantity and quality. This study investigates this topic under calcareous soil conditions in newly reclaimed desert lands in Egypt, as this topic has not previously been studied.

The objective of our research was to investigate the effect of different nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium fertilizers on the yield and quality of plants cultivated in calcareous soil to improve the characteristics of the fruits by knowing the appropriate fertilizer rates. As a result, the area of this crop on those lands has grown.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Experimental details and treatments

 

Experimental details: The experiment was set up in the cactus pear farm in the El-Hammam region (30° 50′ N and 29° 23′ E), Matrouh Governorate, Egypt, over two seasons in 2020 and 2021. Five-year-old cactus pear plants (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) grown in sandy soil and spaced 2 × 5 m apart are subjected to a drip irrigation system. The experimental soil's physical and chemical analyses are shown in Table 1. The chemical analysis of the used water for irrigation is recorded in Table 1. The parameters of compost manure added to the farm are presented in Table 2.

Treatments: This work aimed to determine plants' best-added nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels. Healthy vegetation, nearly in shape and size and productivity were chosen for this experiment. The experiment was designed as a randomized complete block design with four replicates for each treatment. The applied nine fertilization treatments were as the following:

 

1-         Control

2-         100 g N + 40 g P + 70 g K / plant

3-         100 g N + 40 g P + 90 g K / plant

4-         100 g N + 60 g P + 70 g K / plant

5-         100 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K / plant

6-         120 g N + 40 g P + 70 g K / plant

7-         120 g N + 40 g P + 90 g K / plant

8-         120 g N + 60 g P + 70 g K / plant

9-         120 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K / plant

 

The used chemical fertilizers sources were ammonium nitrate (33% N), calcium superphosphate (15.5% P2O5) and potassium sulphate (48% K2O). Nitrogen fertilizer was divided into two equal doses, the first 50% of nitrogen fertilizer was added at the end of February and the second 50% of nitrogen fertilizer was added after three weeks of full bloom, at the beginning of May, in both seasons. Potassium fertilizer was divided into two equal doses and added as a soil application while adding nitrogen fertilizer. Nitrogen and potassium fertilizers were added as soil applications at a depth of 15 cm and 1 m from the trunk. The ordinary organic fertilization program was 15 kg/plant of compost manure with phosphate added to a trench in the first week of January. Fruits were taken from each treated plant at harvest time to determine the quantity and physical and chemical aspects. The response of cactus pear plants to fertilization treatments was evaluated through the following determinations:

I) Vegetative growth and pigment measurements: Number of cladodes, cladodes length (cm), cladodes width (cm), cladodes area (cm2), chlorophyll a (mg/g), chlorophyll b (mg/g), total chlorophyll and carotenoids (mg/g).

II) Fruiting measurements: Fruit set%, number of fruits/plant, fruit yield (kg)/plant, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm), fruit volume (cm3), juice weight (g), peel weight (g), peel thikness (cm), pulp weight/fruit (g), number of seeds/fruit, seeds weight/fruit (g), fruit TSS (%), total acidity content (%), fruit TSS / acid ratio, and ascorbic acid (mg/100 mL juice) according to the methods described by (AOAC 1995; Barros et al. 2016).

 

Statistical analysis

 

The obtained data were subjected to an analysis of variance according to Clarke and Kempson (1997). The means were differentiated using the range test at the 0.05 level (Duncan 1955).

 

Results

 

I- Vegetative growth and pigment measurements: Data in Table 3 showed the effect of mineral fertilization on vegetative growth parameters in both seasons. Generally, NPK nutrient addition significantly enhanced growth Table 1: The soil and irrigation water analyses

 

Characteristics

Values

Soil physical properties

 

Sand

93.10%

Silt

1.04%

Clay

5.86%

Soil texture

Sandy

Soil chemical properties

 

Organic matter

0.10%

pH

8.30

Electrical conductivity

294.40 mg.kg-1

HCO3-

0.02 meq/100 g soil

Cl-

0.05 meq/100 g soil

SO42 -

0.35 meq/100 g soil

Ca2+

0.06 meq/100 g soil

Mg2+

0.05 meq/100 g soil

Na+

0.3 meq/100 g soil

K+

0.01 meq/100 g soil

CaCO3

39%

Irrigation water chemical properties

 

pH

7.45

Electrical conductivity

485.00 mg.kg-1

HCO3-

4.83 meq/L

Cl-

1.73 meq/L

SO42 -

1.04 meq/L

Ca2+

2.04 meq/L

Mg2+

1.38 meq/L

Na+

2.41 meq/L

K+

1.78 meq/L

 

Table 2: The compost manure physico-chemical analysis

 

Characteristics

Values

Weight of m3

625 kg

pH

7.85

Electrical conductivity

1760.00 mg.kg-1

N

1.60%

C/N ratio

17:1

P

0.70%

K

1.25%

Fe2+

1587.50 mg.kg-1

Mn2+

162.50 mg.kg-1

Cu2+

65.00 mg.kg-1

Zn2+

21.50 mg.kg-1

 

Table 3: Effect of fertilization treatments (g/plant) on number of cladodes, cladodes length, cladodes width, and cladodes area of cactus pear during the two successive seasons

 

Treatments

   Number of cladodes

Cladodes length (cm)

Cladodes width (cm)

Cladodes area (cm2)

N

P

K

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

0

0

0

5.70 f

6.70 i

24.76 e

24.51 f

16.10 e

17.57 d

273.62 e

300.14 g

100

40

70

7.00 ef

8.00 h

32.60 d

31.27 e

17.35 d

19.50 cd

388.28 d

417.41 f

100

40

90

9.00 de

11.00 f

35.35 c

33.46 d

19.35 c

19.49 bc

370.21 c

475.94 de

100

60

70

7.70 ef

9.00 g

34.85 c

35.25 cd

17.85 d

18.46 cd

427.42 d

444.55 ef

100

60

90

10.70 cd

13.00 d

35.85 c

35.75 c

19.35 d

19.83 b

476.83 c

491.53 cd

120

40

70

12.30 cd

14.70 c

38.85 b

38.75 b

19.60 bc

19.59 b

524.00 b

526.31 bc

120

40

90

18.70 a

19.70 a

40.60 b

42.25 a

20.10 bc

20.11 b

561.91 b

565.16 b

120

60

70

11.00 cd

11.70 e

38.60 b

38.75 b

20.60 ab

19.62 b

547.30 b

523.64 bc

120

60

90

16.00 b

17.00 b

43.60 a

41.25 a

21.35 a

21.89 a

640.07 a

659.28 a

Means with the same letter are not significantly dierent at 5% level of probability

 

 

 

characteristics compared to the control treatment.

Adding the maximum rate of fertilizers of 120 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K/plant significantly surpassed others in terms of the number of cladodes, cladode length, cladode width and cladode area. These measurements for the first season were 16.00 cladodes, 43.60 cm, 21.35 cm and 640.07 cm2, respectively. In comparison, the records of the second season were 17.00 cladodes, 41.25 cm, 21.89 cm and 659.28 Table 4: Effect of fertilization treatments (g/plant) on chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids of cactus pear during the two successive seasons

 

Treatments

Chlorophyll a (mg/g)

Chlorophyll b (mg/g)

Total chlorophyll (mg/g)

Carotenoids (mg/g)

N

P

K

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

0

0

0

3.75 i

3.58 h

9.27 i

7.93 i

13.02 h

11.68 i

1.21 f

1.34 h

100

40

70

4.41 h

3.88 g

11.50 h

8.10 h

15.93 g

12.52 h

1.91 e

1.75 g

100

40

90

4.86 d

4.82 d

12.08 f

10.52 g

16.95 ef

15.39 g

2.39 bcd

2.22 e

100

60

70

4.55 g

4.69 f

11.87 g

11.55 f

16.43 fg

16.09 f

2.06 de

2.14 f

100

60

90

4.92 d

5.00 c

12.30 d

11.90 e

17.23 de

16.83 e

2.56 b

2.41 d

120

40

70

4.71 f

4.76 e

13.14 c

12.55 c

17.86 bc

17.27 d

2.14 cde

2.26 e

120

40

90

4.90 c

5.17 b

13.22 b

12.63 b

18.13ab

17.54 b

2.72 ab

2.69 c

120

60

70

4.78 b

4.78 de

12.19 e

12.51 d

17.53 cd

17.29 c

2.44 bc

3.08 b

120

60

90

5.09 a

5.28 a

13.59 a

12.96 a

18.68 a

18.05 a

3.02 a

3.23 a

Means with the same letter are not significantly dierent at 5% level of probability

 

Table 5: Effect of fertilization treatments (g/plant) on fruit set, number of fruits/plant and fruit yield (kg)/plant of cactus pear during the two successive seasons

 

Treatments

       Fruit set (%)

       Number of fruits/plant

       Fruit yield/plant (kg)

N

P

K

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

0

0

0

50.13 e

49.07 f

53.00 g

51.67 i

3.05 h

2.95 g

100

40

70

56.75 d

55.56 e

99.33 f

97.00 h

8.00 g

8.22 f

100

40

90

60.29 c

61.86 cd

110.00 f

108.67 g

10.79 f

11.44 e

100

60

70

61.49 c

61.72 d

136.33 e

134.00 f

15.42 e

16.15 d

100

60

90

62.45 bc

63.57 bcd

154.33 d

155.67 e

15.27 e

16.11 d

120

40

70

64.97 b

65.95 b

167.33 c

166.00 d

17.24 d

18.31 c

120

40

90

73.49 a

72.33 a

173.00 c

172.67 c

19.77 c

18.96 c

120

60

70

65.28 b

64.77 bc

195.00 b

200.00 b

24.18 b

23.58 b

120

60

90

73.53 a

73.37 a

210.00 a

209.33 a

32.18 a

32.99 a

Means with the same letter are not significantly dierent at 5% level of probability

 

Table 6: Effect of fertilization treatments (g/plant)) on fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, and fruit volume of cactus pear during the two successive seasons

 

Treatments

      Fruit weight (g)

      Fruit length (cm)

    Fruit width (cm)

  Fruit volume (cm3)

N

P

K

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

0

0

0

55.70 f

57.76 f

6.20 e

6.59 h

4.14 e

4.70 i

63.33 f

65.33 f

100

40

70

82.88 e

80.38 e

7.26 d

6.61 g

4.82 d

5.37 h

90.67 e

91.00 e

100

40

90

109.58 c

113.03 c

7.86 c

8.19 d

5.13 bc

5.68 d

110.33 d

112.00 cd

100

60

70

103.91 d

98.17 d

6.29 e

7.57 f

4.95 cd

5.49 g

104.67 d

106.33 d

100

60

90

118.59 b

114.21 c

7.93 bc

8.29 c

5.21 bc

5.71 c

120.00 c

122.00 bc

120

40

70

104.20 d

98.85 d

7.39 d

7.57 f

4.99 cd

5.50 f

107.33 d

110.00 cd

120

40

90

120.96 b

124.01 b

8.29 b

8.62 b

5.29 b

5.76 b

132.00 b

135.67 b

120

60

70

109.31 c

103.10 d

7.62 cd

8.01 e

5.11 bc

5.67 e

110.33 d

110.67 cd

120

60

90

157.09 a

149.89 a

9.23 a

9.48 a

6.03 a

6.64 a

156.67 a

159.00 a

Means with the same letter are not significantly dierent at 5% level of probability

 

 

 

cm2 concerning the number of cladodes, cladode length, cladode width, and cladode area, respectively. For the content of the pigments (Table 4), the application of NPK fertilization induced a high positive effect on chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations over the control of the investigation. The results indicated that the top rate of chemical fertilizers produced the significant maximum contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids. These values for the first season were 5.09, 13.59, 18.68 and 3.02 mg/g and the readings for the second season were 5.28, 12.96, 18.05 and 3.23 mg/g about chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids, in the same order.

II) Fruiting measurements: Data in Table 5 presented the effect of NPK fertilization on fruit yield attributes. Also, its influence on fruit's physical properties was shown in Tables 6–8, while the results of its impact on fruit's chemical parameters were exhibited in Table 9. Compared to unfertilized plants, which recorded the lowest values, the added NPK fertilization improved these traits. In most cases, the highest level of NPK fertilizers significantly produced the maximum characters during both study seasons. Concerning fruit yield attributes, values of the first season were 73.53%, 210.00 fruits and 32.18 kg; moreover, data of the second season were 73.37%, 209.33 fruits, and 32.99 kg for fruit set percentage, number of fruits per plant, and fruit yield per plant (kg), respectively (Table 5). Relating to the fruit's physical properties, the measurements for the same fertilization treatment in the first season were 157.09 g, 9.23 cm, 6.03 cm, 156.67 cm3 (Table 6), 39.83 g, 74.82 g, 0.53 cm (Table 7), 82.27 g, and 187.00 seeds (Table 8). Further, in the second year, there were 149.89 g, Table 7: Effect of fertilization treatments (g/plant) on juice weight, peel weight and peel thikness of cactus pear during the two successive seasons

 

Treatments

        Juice weight (g)

       Peel weight (g)

      Peel thickness (cm)

N

P

K

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

0

0

0

11.53 f

13.57 g

33.80 e

34.25 f

0.32 e

0.31 f

100

40

70

16.10 e

16.99 f

40.56 d

39.81 e

0.32 e

0.35 e

100

40

90

27.73 bc

27.89 c

48.25 c

48.16 c

0.38 d

0.40 c

100

60

70

24.41 d

25.29 e

45.02 cd

44.09 d

0.36 d

0.35 de

100

60

90

28.39 b

29.49 b

57.70 b

59.78 b

0.40 c

0.41 c

120

40

70

25.14 d

26.54 d

47.51 c

44.38 cd

0.38 cd

0.37 de

120

40

90

28.62 b

29.49 b

60.27 b

59.99 b

0.49 b

0.49 b

120

60

70

26.13 cd

26.72 d

47.91 c

47.62 cd

0.38 d

0.37 de

120

60

90

39.83 a

40.72 a

74.82 a

73.82 a

0.53 a

0.54 a

Means with the same letter are not significantly dierent at 5% level of probability

 

Table 8: Effect of fertilization treatments (g/plant) on pulp weight/fruit, number of seeds/fruit, and seeds weight/fruit of cactus pear during the two successive seasons

 

Treatments

Pulp weight/fruit (g)

Number of seeds/fruit

Seeds weight/fruit (g)

N

P

K

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

0

0

0

21.91 d

21.44 d

108.00 g

112.67 g

2.44 d

2.90 cd

100

40

70

42.32 c

43.07 c

118.33 ef

114.67 g

2.61 cd

2.86 cd

100

40

90

61.32 b

61.42 b

132.00 cd

138.67 d

2.99 bcd

3.157 cd

100

60

70

58.89 b

59.82 b

116.33 f

125.33 f

2.35 d

2.61 d

100

60

90

60.88 b

58.81 b

138.33 c

144.33 c

3.63 ab

3.88 ab

120

40

70

56.69 b

59.83 b

124.67 de

133.33 e

2.82 cd

2.903 cd

120

40

90

60.68 b

60.96 b

146.33 b

152.00 b

3.74 a

3.99 a

120

60

70

61.40 b

61.70 b

126.33 d

133.67 e

2.92 bcd

3.13 cd

120

60

90

82.27 a

83.27 a

187.00 a

191.33 a

3.19 abc

3.29 bc

Means with the same letter are not significantly dierent at 5% level of probability

 

Table 9: Effect of fertilization treatments (g/plant) on fruit T.S.S., total acidity content, fruit T.S.S. / acid ratio, and ascorbic acid of cactus pear during the two successive seasons

 

Treatments

 Fruit T.S.S. (%)

Total acidity content (%)

Fruit T.S.S. / acid ratio

   Ascorbic acid (mg)

N

P

K

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

0

0

0

8.90 d

9.03 f

0.47 a

0.50 a

19.17 e

18.16 e

11.22 f

11.26 g

100

40

70

9.80 cd

9.93 e

0.40 b

0.43 ab

24.57 de

23.00 d

11.41 f

11.67 f

100

40

90

11.96 a

12.23 ab

0.30 d

0.43 ab

39.96 a

28.03 c

12.94 de

13.73 d

100

60

70

10.46 bc

10.43 d

0.40 b

0.40 b

26.23 cd

26.23 cd

12.94 de

11.57 fg

100

60

90

12.23 a

12.03 b

0.30 d

0.30 c

40.83 a

40.83 ab

13.61 cd

14.31 c

120

40

70

10.90 b

10.63 d

0.37 bc

0.30 c

30.43 bc

36.36 b

12.84 e

13.30 e

120

40

90

12.26 a

12.03 b

0.30 d

0.30 c

40.90 a

40.90 ab

14.72 b

16.18 a

120

60

70

10.90 b

11.13 c

0.33 cd

0.30 c

33.40 b

36.36 b

14.20 bc

15.33 b

120

60

90

12.63 a

12.56 a

0.30 d

0.30 c

42.10 a

42.10 a

15.41 a

16.31 a

Means with the same letter are not significantly dierent at 5% level of probability

 

9.48 cm, 6.64 cm, 159.00 cm3 (Table 6), 40.72 g, 73.82 g, 0.54 cm (Table 7), 83.27 g, and 191.33 seeds (Table 8) for fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, fruit volume, juice weight, peel weight, peel thickness, pulp weight/fruit, and the number of seeds/fruit. The best fruit's chemical parameters came from the treatments of applying 120 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K/plant followed by 120 g N + 40 g P + 90 g K/plant and then 100 g N + 60 g P + 90 g K/plant (Table 9). These constituents of fruit T.S.S. (%), fruit T.S.S. / acid ratio and ascorbic acid in the first season were 12.63, 12.26, 12.23%; 42.10, 40.90, 40.83 ratio; 15.41, 14.72, 13.61 mg and in the second season were 12.56, 12.03, 12.03%; 42.10, 40.90, 40.83 ratio; 16.31, 16.18, 14.31 mg, respectively. On the other side, increasing NPK fertilization decreased the total acidity content of fruits.

Discussion

 

It was evident that NPK fertilization improved the quantity parameters (number of fruits per plant and yield per plant). Also, it improved the quality characteristics (fruit length, fruit width, fruit volume, juice weight, pulp weight/fruit, fruit TSS, total acidity content, fruit TSS / acid ratio, and ascorbic acid content).

There are several possible explanations for nitrogen fertilizer's role in increased growth and fruit production. It is a component that is necessary for the amino acids. Proteins and enzymes are built from amino acids. Nitrogen is also a component of the chlorophyll molecule, which enables the plant to capture the sun's energy through photosynthesis and thus increase the amount of total chlorophyll it contains. Nitrogen may be a significant component of some chemicals that play an essential physiological role in metabolism, resulting in increased carbohydrate production and improved overall fruit quality. Consequently, there was an increase in the amount and quality of fruits that could be harvested (Nijjar 1985; Mengel et al. 2001).

Phosphorus is a component of plants' complex nucleic acid structure, and it controls the production of proteins. Phosphorus plays an essential role in the process of cell division and is linked to the complex transformation of energy. Phosphorus is an indispensable nutrient for producing ATP, which serves as the "energy unit" in the cells of plants. Because of this, every plant needs phosphorus to stay as healthy and robust as possible (Jain 2017).

Potassium plays an essential role in the processes of enzyme activation, protein synthesis, photosynthesis, and cell formation, which may explain why it has a positive effect on crop growth and yield. Potassium is a vital component for plant development. It plays a role in the activation of enzymes that are found within the plant. Potassium regulates the frequency with which stomata open and close, which controls the movement of water vapor, oxygen, and carbon dioxide into and out of the plant. As a result, the fruit's quantity and quality were enhanced (Erner et al. 2001; Ganeshamurthy et al. 2011).

According to the research published by (Arba et al. 2002; Stewart et al. 2005; Dubeux et al. 2006; Silva et al. 2012; Mimouni et al. 2013; Zegbe et al. 2014; Souza et al. 2017), chemical fertilization had a positive effect on the shoot development and fruit production of cactus pear plants. Our findings were in agreement with their findings.

 

Conclusion

 

Cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) plants benefited from the application of NPK fertilizer because it led to enhanced vegetative growth, higher fruit yield and improved fruit quality. At this location in the El-Hammam region, the ideal level of chemical fertilization was provided by a basal dressing consisting of 120 g of nitrogen, 60 g of phosphorus, and 90 g of potassium applied to each plant.

 

Acknowledgements

 

The authors would like to thank Prof. Mahmoud Sakr for his suggestions. The authors also extend their gratitude to the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT) for providing the opportunity to pursue studies through the scientific project entitled "Maximizing the Use of Succulent Plants for the Development of Populations in Matrouh Governorate."

 

Author Contributions

 

All authors contributed equally. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

 

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

 

Data Availability

 

Data presented in this study will be available on a fair request to the corresponding author.

 

Ethics Approval

 

Not applicable in this paper.

 

Funding Source

 

Project of Maximizing the Use of Succulent Plants for the Development of Populations in Matrouh Governorate, Regional Development Center, El-Hammam city, Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Egypt.

 

References

 

AOAC (1995). Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA

Fattah MSA, SEA Badr, EM Khalil, AS Elsaid (2020). Feed efficiency, some blood parameters and in-vitro chemoprevention of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica L.) seeds oil growing in Egypt. Issues Biol Sci Pharm Res 8:20‒28

Aboukila EF, IN Nassar, M Rashad, M Hafez, JB Norton (2018). Reclamation of calcareous soil and improvement of squash growth using brewers’ spent grain and compost. J Saud Soc Agric Sci 17:390‒397

Arba M, MC Benismail, M Mokhtari (2002). The cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) in Morocco: Main species and cultivar characterization. Acta Hortic 581:103‒109

Badr SEA, MSA Fattah, AS Elsaid (2019). Productive performance and meat quality of commercial Cobb chicken fed diets containing different levels of prickly pear fruits (Opuntia ficus indica) peel. Bull Nat Res Cent 43:1‒12

Barros JLD, SLR Donato, VM Gomes, PER Donato, JAD Silva, MCP Junior (2016). Palma forrageira ‘gigante’ cultivada com adubação orgânica. Rev Agrotecnol 7:5365

Claassens AS, AB Wessels (1997). The fertilizer requirements of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) under summer rainfall conditions in South Africa. Acta Hortic 438:83‒95

Clarke G, RE Kempson (1997). Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Experiments, Arnold, 1St edn. A Member of the Holder Headline Group, London, UK

Dubeux JJCB, MVF Santos, MA Lira, DC Santos, I Farias, LE Lima, RLC Ferreira (2006). Productivity of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller under different N and P fertilization and plant population in northeast Brasil. J Arid Environ 67:357372

Duncan DB (1955). Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:124

Elgabaly MM (1973). Reclamation and management of the calcareous soils of Egypt. In: FAO Soils Bulletin 21, Calcareous soils: Report of the FAO/UNDP Regional Seminar on Reclamation and Management of Calcareous Soils, Vol. 21, pp:123–127, 27 Nov – 2 Dec 1972. Cairo, Egypt

El-Hady OA, SA Abo-Sedera (2006). Conditioning effect of composts and acrylamide hydrogels on a sandy calcareous soil. II-Physico-bio-chemical properties of the soil. Intl J Agric Biol 8:876‒884

Erner Y, Y Kaplan, B Artzi, M Hamou (2001). Potassium affects citrus tree performance. The Volcani Center, Institute of Horticulture, Department of Fruit Trees, Bet Dagan, Israel

FAO (2016). FAO Soils Portal: Management of Calcareous Soils. Available at: https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/ management-of-some-problem-soils/calcareous-soils/ar/

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2018). Crop Ecology, Cultivation and Uses of Cactus Pear. Rome, Italy

Ganeshamurthy AN, GC Satisha, P Patil (2011). Potassium nutrition on yield and quality of fruit crops special emphasis on banana and grapes. Karnat J Agric Sci 24:29‒38

Jain VK (2017). Fundamentals of Plant Physiology. S Chand Publishing, New Delhi, India‎

Kuti JO (2004). Antioxidant compounds from four Opuntia cactus pear fruit varieties. Food Chem 85:527‒533

Mason M (2015). Cactus cultivation as adaptation method for women in Egypt. Available at: https://ccafs.cgiar.org/news/cactus-cultivation-adaptation-method-women-egypt

Mengel KE, A Kirkbt, H Koesgarten, T Appel (2001). Principles of Plant Nutrition, 5th Edition. El- Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

Miller L (2015). Opuntia Ficus-indica. Ecocrop, FAO, Rome, Italy

Mimouni A, AA Lhaj, M Ghazi (2013). Mineral nutrition effect on cactus (Opuntia ficus spp.) growth and development. Acta Hortic 995:213–220

Neffar S, H Chenchouni, A Beddiar, N Redjel (2013). Rehabilitation of degraded rangeland in drylands by prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) plantations: effect on soil and spontaneous vegetation. Ecol Balk 5:63‒76

Neto JD, RMD Matos, PFD Silva, ASD Lima, CAVD Azevedo, LMF Saboya (2020). Growth and yield of cactus pear under irrigation frequencies and nitrogen fertilization. Bras Engen Agríc Amb 10:664671


Nijjar GS (1985). Nutrition of Fruit Trees. Published by MrsUsha Raj Kumar for Kalyani, New Delhi, India

Silva JAD, P Bonomo, SLR Donato, AJV Pires, RCCD Rosa, ER Paulo (2012). Composição mineral em cladódios de palma forrageira sob diferentes espaçamentos e adubações química. Rev Bras Ciênc Agrár 7:866875

Silva JAD, SL Donato, PE Donato, ED Souza, MCP Júnior, S Junior (2016). Yield and vegetative growth of cactus pear at different spacings and under chemical fertilizations. Rev Bras Engen Agríc Amb 20:564569

Souza TCD, MVFD Santos, JCBJ Dubeux, MA Lira, DCD Santos, MVD Cunha, LED Lima, RRD Silva (2017). Productivity and nutrient concentration in spineless cactus under different fertilizations and plant densities. Rev Bras Cienc Agrar Recife 12:555560

Stewart WM, DW Dibb, AE Johnston, TJ Smyth (2005). Contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron J 97:16

Ueckert DN (2020). Pricklypear Ecology. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

Zegbe JA, A Serna-Perez, J Mena-Covarrubias (2014). Mineral nutrition enhances yield and affects fruit quality of Cristalina cactus pear. Sci Hortic 167:63‒70

Zegbe JA, A Serna-Pérez, J Mena-Covarrubias (2015). Soil applications of NPK affect fruit quality and shelf-life of ‘Cristalina’ cactus pear. Fruits 70:297‒302

Zimmer C (2013). Vitamins’ Old, Old Edge. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/10/science/vitamins-old-old-edge.html